Paul R. House: "Don't Mess With the Virgin's Protector"

I just recently finished Paul R. House's commentary on 1 and 2 Kings. Aside from being appropriately technical (actually citing relevant source material, a rarity in the commentary world) House is wonderfully warm and applicative.

As Sennacherib besieges Jerusalem, bent on destroying Hezekiah for his anti-Assyrian policy, Rabshekah, a messenger of Sennacherib, states to the listening mass of Jerusalem on behalf of Sennacherib,

Do not let Hezekiah persuade you to trust in the LORD when he says, 'The Lord will surely deliver us; this city will not be given into the hand of the king of Assyria.'...Has the god of any nation ever delivered his land from the hand of the king of Assyria? Where are the gods of Hamath and Arpad? Where are the gods of Sephavarim, Hena and Ivvah? Have they rescued Samaria from my hand? Who of all the gods of these countries has been able to save his land from me? How then can the LORD deliver Jerusalem from my hand? (2 Kgs. 18:28-35)

What is the problem with this? Indeed, Samaria fell with supposed trust in YHWH so why would not Jerusalem fall to Sennacherib? Had Hezekiah not turned to YHWH it seems likely that they would have fallen, but Hezekiah did turn to YHWH and the result is both miraculous and incredible: Assyria loses 185,000 men and fails in its attempt to make Hezekiah pay for his anti-Assyrian policies. God's response is clear enough through Isaiah the prophet,

This is the word that the Lord has spoken against [Sennacherib]: "The virgin daughter of Zion despises you and mocks you. The Daughter of Jerusalem tosses her head as you flee. Who is it that you have insulted and blasphemed? Against whom have you raised your voice and lifted your eyes in pride? Against the Holy One of Israel!" (2 Kgs. 19:21-22)

Sennacherib wasn't messing with non-existent gods. Sennacherib was messing with YHWH, the Holy One of Israel, the Almighty Sovereign of the universe. House well notes,

God's response begins with the promise of a reversal of fortunes. Assyria has been oppressing Judah, and certainly expects to continue doing so. Their king has mocked Judah's king and Judah's God. But everything will soon change. Jerusalem is personified as a virgin daughter who tosses her head in disdain at the proud, once-powerful Assyrians, who believe they have made themselves great. Indeed they have been great, but their repuatation will not be "enhanced" by the rape of this virgin. Why? Because in insulting the virgin they have insulted the virgin's protector, who happens to rule the universe. (House 369-370)

Lesson? Don't mess with YHWH. Worship YHWH. Turn to YHWH in times of trouble because only YHWH, the Holy One of Israel, can deliver in the face of incredible opposition.

Loving the Sovereign with you friends,

R. D. Thompson

John Rosemond on Being a Good Husband

I found the most incredible article in our newspaper today by John Rosemond. How our editor won't lose his job I don't know. Rosemond noted a thing that is very close to my heart: Dads should work at being better husbands instead of obsessing over being the perfect dad.

I have always been concerned that no one chorused with my somewhat harsh statement that I make to my wife often. It goes like this, "I'm not losing you to our children. We will give those kids to a babysitter as often as possible. We will not lose our marriage. As soon as they can be left alone with a babysitter for multiple hours, we're out." I have gotten some funny looks for that but I have to think that it's true. I have seen far too many husbands and wives who have children and suddenly never talk to each other. No more flirting, no more building up, no more talking, just get those kids taken care of. Usually this descends into incessant bickering, no major screaming matches, just bickering, and if there is one thing I hate more than all things when I look at a marriage it is a couple bent on bickering constantly.

Rosemond nails it,

"Forty-plus years ago, men (I am aware I'm speaking in general, but nonetheless accurate, terms) understood that one became a good father by devoting oneself to being the best husband one could be. Those men came home from work not to get down on the floor and play with their children, but to catch up with their wives.

Today's men (and I speak in general terms again) are trying so hard to be good dads that they've all but forgotten how to be husbands. (In all fairness, however, today's typical wife is acting as if she took a vow on her wedding day that said, 'I take you to be my husband until children do us part.')"

Yeah that's about right. Now why would this be? Don't miss this,

"My theory is that all too many men have bought in and therefore caved in to feminist propaganda to the effect that we're insensitive aggressors who only want to subjugate women and children so they will not hinder the progress of the patriarchy or some such nonsense. In the process of cooperating in this emasculating, a father ends up providing his kids with a second mother of sorts.

The only vestige of masculinity that remains in his fathering is the high-five he frequently gives his kids. But the high-five completes the transformation: He's no longer a truly masculine father, and he's no longer an adult either. He's his kids' best buddy. Ergo, he will not discipline them for fear of damaging the relationship — which further damages his relationship with his wife.

The more I think about it, the more convinced I become that the good old days — when dads came home fully prepared, at a word from their wives, to strike terror into their children — were far preferable to the current state of affairs.

Is it too late to bring back the patriarchy?"

Incredible. Listen well friends and don't abandon the most beloved person you will ever have just to "be a better parent." Being a better parent means being a better spouse.

Loving Christ with You Friends,

R. D. Thompson